tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4870469898075340826.post2108798131076377046..comments2023-05-20T06:50:33.000-06:00Comments on The Colorado Right to Life Blog: Pro-Life Candidates (October Update - Colorado 2010)Bob Kyffinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16850445523359819419noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4870469898075340826.post-61496799677877415272010-10-30T21:28:28.929-06:002010-10-30T21:28:28.929-06:00This will be interesting. I am running in the 3rd ...This will be interesting. I am running in the 3rd Congressional district as the write-in candidate against Salazar and Tipton, whom according to this blog, are not 100% pro life, so technically I should receive the vote of every 3rd CD right to life voter.<br />It will be a sad day if CRTL voters compromise CRTL for party. Write-in "John W Hargis Sr"John W Hargis sr 4 Congresshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03343418547252663420noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4870469898075340826.post-37897743105604380642010-10-30T21:18:19.146-06:002010-10-30T21:18:19.146-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.John W Hargis sr 4 Congresshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03343418547252663420noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4870469898075340826.post-65096420455252014392010-10-29T14:08:40.367-06:002010-10-29T14:08:40.367-06:00Thanks for your reply.
~BBFThanks for your reply. <br />~BBFAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4870469898075340826.post-74305250737556536802010-10-29T12:02:35.507-06:002010-10-29T12:02:35.507-06:00BigBen,
CRTL has not surveyed judges, primarily b...BigBen,<br /><br />CRTL has not surveyed judges, primarily because their likelihood of responding is very low. Judges, as a practice, don't want to go on record.<br /><br />A judge's decision record is our only real way of knowing where a judge stands on pro-life matters, and we are unaware of any specifically pro-life matters Colorado judges have ruled on.<br /><br />In future years, hopefully someone will be able to help us evaluate judges for their votes, especially if Amendment 62 passes, which may put some judges on record. For now, Kent Lambert's opinion can be trusted in general, and also perhaps the opinion of CleartheBenchColorado.org. <br /><br />CRTL is aware of no "pro-Personhood" judges, per se. It can generally be assumed that none of them are, and until the political climate changes due to the election of pro-Personhood candidates, that is unlikely to change.Bob Kyffinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16850445523359819419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4870469898075340826.post-70398600077622617712010-10-27T19:34:38.868-06:002010-10-27T19:34:38.868-06:00Thank you for this list, but what about the Judges...Thank you for this list, but what about the Judges? Retain or not. <br /><br />That would be more useful.<br />Here is the recommendation of Ken Lambert:<br /><br />No on Michael Bender, Alex Martinez and Nancy Rice<br /><br />Yes on John Daniel Dailey, Richard L. Gabriel, Nancy J. Lichtenstein, and David J. Richman<br /><br />However, I needed the recommendation for Jeffco Judges that are Pro-Personhood. We seem to be ignoring the hell out of the Judges. I know there is Judge review, but I am referring to whether if they are Pro-Personhood or not. Thanks.<br /><br />~BigBenFactorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4870469898075340826.post-71085555189307097792010-10-26T21:37:44.450-06:002010-10-26T21:37:44.450-06:00Thank you for the update.Thank you for the update.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16529152689517839118noreply@blogger.com